Published in the North Carolina HFMA Chapter Newsletter, Tarheel News, September 2025 | Author: Elizabeth Purdy, J.D., Associate Attorney, Aspirion
Healthcare revenue cycle teams facing exhausted appeal windows and passed timely filing deadlines have a powerful but underutilized tool at their disposal: good faith appeals. This strategic approach reopens payer dialogue and recovers revenue that would otherwise be written off, offering a viable path forward when all traditional options appear closed.
Understanding Good Faith Appeals in Revenue Cycle Strategy
Good faith appeals operate outside formal regulatory processes and standard payer timelines, serving as strategic requests for reconsideration when denials were unjustified but no longer eligible for formal review. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines indicate that plans may accept appeals after the standard 65-day timeframe when filing parties demonstrate good cause, providing regulatory foundation for this approach.
Healthcare organizations should consider good faith appeals when system failures cause missed deadlines, strong clinical cases lack procedural standing, retroactive coverage issues arise, payer policy violations occur, or duplicate claim rejections block corrections.
Documented Success in Revenue Recovery
Recent case studies demonstrate significant recovery potential: a 2024 Medicare Advantage case recovered over $15,000 after two denied appeals, another 2024 Medicare Advantage case recovered over $14,000 following similar circumstances, and a 2023 commercial insurance case recovered over $31,000 after timely filing deadlines had passed.
Essential Components of Effective Good Faith Appeals
Successful good faith appeals require significantly more than standard form letters. They must include comprehensive documentation of medical necessity or corrected errors, detailed explanations of extenuating circumstances, supportive clinical literature or payer policy excerpts aligned with established guidelines, and compelling narratives demonstrating equity and clinical impact.
The appeals must humanize the denial while highlighting corrected documentation gaps. This approach proves particularly effective for high-dollar, medically necessary care where payers show greater willingness to reconsider claims with proper context—especially when escalation reveals conflicts with federal standards, clinical guidelines, or continuity of care requirements.
AI Technology Enhancing Appeal Effectiveness
Artificial intelligence addresses the challenge of bridging clinical facts with payer expectations by analyzing medical records and auto-generating clinical summaries aligned with established guidelines like MCG and InterQual. AI-powered solutions strengthen good faith appeals by reducing manual record review time, connecting patient care directly to recognized clinical criteria, delivering more credible cases for high-dollar or past-timely denials, highlighting discrepancies between denial rationale and clinical evidence, and ensuring consistent case presentation.
While AI cannot replace human expertise, it amplifies effectiveness by streamlining technical work and sharpening narrative quality—particularly critical when traditional appeal windows have closed and synthesizing clinical and coding context into cohesive narratives becomes essential.
Strategic Implementation Considerations
Good faith appeals demand precision in case selection, detailed storytelling, and proper channel escalation. Many payers, particularly for high-value medically necessary services, demonstrate willingness to reconsider claims when appropriate context and documentation accompany requests—transforming what appears to be final denials into recoverable revenue.
For healthcare organizations seeking to minimize write-offs and maximize revenue recovery, good faith appeals represent an essential strategy in comprehensive denials management programs. When traditional appeal pathways close, this approach provides a viable alternative for advocating that clinically appropriate care deserves appropriate reimbursement.
Read the full article here.